|
|
CMS response on Greenbelt and Gene Robinson
An article has appeared on Anglican Mainstream which may concern some. To allay any confusion, CMS offers a few points of clarification.
- For CMS, the proper place for mission is being in the marketplace. CMS has had a venue at the Greenbelt Festival for many years and it is a brilliant platform from which to offer hospitality and share the gospel.
- GB is not a confessional event but primarily a 'space' for Christians to engage with the arts and cultural trends. There are multiple events, a great range of participants and many thousands of visitors. Many are seekers.
- We are not “sponsors” as has been stated, but “associates” and as such CMS is not involved in the particular decisions under debate.
- While we understand the reasons why Greenbelt has invited Gene Robinson, we are unhappy about it, particularly at this time in the life of the Anglican Communion. CMS supports the Lambeth Conference resolution 1.10 (see our Ethos Statement)
- CMS requirements for people in mission are unequivocal and long-standing because of the gospel and our gospel partnership with Churches in Africa and Asia many of which were planted by CMS.
- CMS this week received a clear bill of health from the Charity Commission having been subject to a Public Benefit Assessment. The Commission made no recommendations for change to the Trustees of CMS. It is a clear affirmation that Evangelistic Mission conveys public benefit.
Published: 15:33 :: 14 July 2009 :: 4854 views ::
2 Comments ::
:: Last updated: 14 July 2009 See other stories in these categories: Press releases
Comments
By
canonken @
18 July 2009 10:15
If only they had looked at the Greenbelt website they would have seen that CMS is not a "sponsor" but an "associate partner."
I fully agree that CMS should be in the "market place" and this is definitely it for young people.
By
DavidMcManus @
17 August 2009 12:40
As a long-term volunteer and steward at Greenbelt, and as a long-term member of CMS, I reckon both are broad communities of Christian faith that need to model dialogue and honest disagreement on this and other issues... To go any other way is to allow the faith to be narrowed down to sexual ethics, and to force the issue. Young (and older) people - we all appreciate the space to get perspective, listen to God and to each other, and walk as faithfully as we can with Jesus and with each other.. name calling by "sides" will not promote respect and truth-telling, nor will exclusion from the open spaces
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can login here